Litigation Risk

Litigation Risk

Despite prudent decisions and the best possible advice, corporate directors face an increase in international legal actions that can impact their personal assets. think:act examines what top managers should look for in corporate D&O (directors and officers) programs.

The Enron scandal of the last decade transformed corporate governance. It also had a lasting effect on the D&O insurance market, given CEO Jeffrey Skilling's legal bills estimated at $23 million: The case piqued interest in the coverage that protects company officers from personal financial liability if they are sued. And, as insurers assessed the riskier business climate, premiums began to rise. Like malpractice insurance for high-level managers, the "directors and officers" insurance forms a worldwide market today, worth $8.8 billion in 2008, and covers top managers in the event of a breach of duty and a resulting lawsuit. Usually reserved for companies with a fair share of assets and management board structures, the pricey insurance policies, with premiums that can reach up to several hundred thousand euros a year for millions in coverage, essentially let individuals hedge the personal financial risks they face by playing in the top league. At the same time, the policies are a tool for making corporate entities responsible for the actions of their employees and protecting corporate assets.

 

D&O  Policy Holders are more likely than ever to be sued.

In the aftermath of the subprime financial crisis, companies as well as their directors are advised to be even more cautious about potential financial liability for their management decisions, says attorney Kevin M. LaCroix, the author of the D&O Diary and a director of OakBridge Insurance Services. That's because D&O policyholders are now more likely to be sued, and more likely to be sued for larger amounts, than in the presubprime era. Whereas class-action lawsuits were once common only in the US, such lawsuits— with their massive potential for financial damage—are gaining popularity outside North America as part of governance reform aimed at securing recourse for shareholders. According to Advisen, an insurance research firm, cases settled since 2005 in Europe were for average settlements of €117 million. Although some anti-corporate activists argue that the coverage creates an incentive for misbehavior, scholars find no evidence that the coverage motivates mismanagement, just as carrying auto liability insurance hardly gives drivers a reason to cause an accident. Suits against managers can come with a host of punitive effects, including reputational  loss, jail time and possible fines in the event of a scandal. Enron's Skilling is serving a 24-year term in prison and was fined $45 million. Fines are typically excluded from a policy's benefits. D&O coverage tends to be best advised on by lawyers and specialized insurance brokers. The specialists recommend that policies go far beyond the basic requirements of being large enough to cover the cost of settlements. They stress that policies must be tailored for each individual buyer, depending on the area of business and the risks present. In the US, a large number of D&O claims are made for a manager's conduct related to human resources, such as hiring and firing decisions. But an increasing number of claims are being filed against directors and officers for securities-related misconduct. What's more, American law is known to have a long arm from which managers around the world might need to defend themselves. Witness the Enron-related case of the NatWest Three. The British bankers involved were extradited to and tried in the United States, where they also served prison terms for wire fraud committed in the UK.

Megan Colwell, an expert in management liability insurance at Woodruff Sawyer & Co., a California insurance brokerage and specialist of international legal actions, offers her clients a choice of roughly 10 to 15 insurers. Her firm is paid by commission from insurance companies or consulting fees from the client. Colwell recommends that companies with international operations acquire specialized advice to align their corporate D&O program to the risks in different countries.

More about international tax on international tax and international legal actions

Moving from one prescribed territory to another

Moving from one prescribed territory to another

An International Lawyer is intended to study all the European Directives. According to the Savings Directive, "If an individual, who is currently reportable because they live in one prescribed territory, moves to a different prescribed territory, you may need to update the address and country of residence information. If the individual moves to a Member State, you may also need to obtain and verify a new TIN, since the information you hold may be out of date (because the TIN to be reported is the TIN issued by the Member State in which the individual resides). If you cannot obtain the new TIN you should obtain, verify and report the date and place of birth.

For example, a UK paying agent makes a savings income payment to a Spanish passport holder whose permanent address is in France. The paying agent has a contractual relationship made on or after 1 January 2004 with the individual, who moves permanently to Germany.

The paying agent currently reports the payee's name, address, country of residence (France) and the French TIN. If the payee moves to Germany, the paying agent will need to report the payee's name, new address and country of residence (now Germany). Since it is a relationship made on or after 1 January 2004 he will also – if Germany is now the country of tax residence - need to obtain and verify the new German TIN or, if it is not available, the date and place of birth."

You can find out about an international lawyer on International Lawyer

Moving from the UK to a prescribed territory

Moving from the UK to a prescribed territory

According to the Savings Directive, "If a UK individual changes address to a prescribed territory you will need to report on the basis of the new address. This may mean you need to obtain additional information and/or update your system.

For example, a UK paying agent pays savings income to an individual who lives in the UK. This is not reportable under the scheme. He has a contractual relationship made on or after 1 January 2004 with the individual.

If the payee moves to Spain, they will become reportable and the paying agent will need to update his records to fulfill his obligations under the scheme. Since he has a relationship which began on or after 1 January 2004 with the individual, he will also need to verify the name and address in addition to obtaining and verifying the TIN or the date and place of birth.

Where both the identity and UK address were verified to KYC standards, and the contractual relationship began after 1 January 2004, subsequent changes can be 'self certified' in accordance with paragraph 183.

 

More information about international Lawyers on International Lawyers

The Grandfathered bonds.

The Grandfathered bonds.

According to the Savings Directive, "Certain negotiable debt securities are not treated as money debts if they meet certain conditions for the duration of a transitional period which ends on 31 December 2010. These securities ("grandfathered bonds") do not then count as money debts for all purposes of the regulations up to 31 December 2010: interest, premiums and discounts derived from these bonds are not savings income; and investment in these bonds does not count when deciding whether the thresholds which determine whether income from certain collective investment funds is savings income have been passed.

A security will be a grandfathered bond if:

• it was first issued before 1 March 2001 or the prospectus was first approved by the appropriate regulatory authority before that date, and

• no further issue was made on or after 1 March 2002.

If the bond is a government bond (or issued by a related public authority or an international organisation – see the Schedule to the regulations) and a further issue is made on or after 1 March 2002, the whole of the issue (whether made before, on or after 1 March 2002) is not a grandfathered bond. The whole issue of the bond is a money debt. If the bond is issued by another type of issuer (e.g. a commercial company) and a further issue is made on or after 1 March 2002, only the part of the issue made on or after 1 March 2002 is not a grandfathered bond. This part of the bond issue is treated as a money debt; the rest of the issue (made before 1 March 2002) is not a money debt."

More about International Lawyers on Abogados Internacionales

The Basel III Reform

In Europe, Basel III will require the credit institutions to have higher core capital in order to absorb the same volume of assets that they have right now, consequently, the return on capital will be lower, with the logical des-incentive for the entry of new investors. On the other hand, in the US, the Volker Rule, is just a new restatement of the old Glass Steagall Act, which protected the financial system by imposing restrictions on the activities carried out by the credit institutions, basically separating the investment banking from the commercial banking activity.

The argument to support this reform is that investment banking exposes the credit institutions to a completely different set of risks compared with commercial banking, with the aggravating factor that these entities are supported by the FDIC or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, so at the end of the day, the excessive risk assumed by the entities through those activities not related to commercial banking may end up being paid with taxpayers' money.

More about International tax